Well, clojure-grimoire.com is available, FWIW. Tim
On Saturday, July 12, 2014 2:46:18 AM UTC-4, Reid McKenzie wrote: > > While I appreciate the interest, I think that attempting to "officiate" > Grimoire is a bad move. > > We already have "clojure.org". "clojure.org" is the only official site. > Grimoire is not condoned by Rich. Using #"clo?j.*\.org would detract > from any future documentation effort Rich and co. may make and implies a > blessing which I do not have, do not seek and do not expect to get. See > http://arrdem.com/2014/07/12/of_mages_and_grimoires/ for more on the > subject. > > Furthermore the #"clo?j.*" is also confusing due to existing namespace > contention from clojuredocs.org and clojure-doc.org let alone > clojure.org should it overnight grow better docs. Case in point: I lost > the link to http://getclojure.com/ for several months until it was > mentioned in IRC in the last week because it fell down the back of my > mental couch with the rest of the "*jure" namespace. > > Reid > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
