Based on this information it sounds like the new Google Closure artifacts are good to go. The keyword thing we'll have to address in a subsequent release. It would be useful to know what Mobile Safari clients you see being affected.
David On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Thomas Heller <th.hel...@gmail.com> wrote: > Geez, 2277 actually works just fine. 2234 doesn't work, but it actually > doesn't work with either closure-library version. Forgot that I reverted to > 2234 due to the keyword issue. > > 2277 + [org.clojure/google-closure-library "0.0-20140718-946a7d39"] > > seems fine, except for that keyword issue. > > Sorry about the confusion, I will shut up now until I have something solid. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescr...@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.