Based on this information it sounds like the new Google Closure
artifacts are good to go. The keyword thing we'll have to address in a
subsequent release. It would be useful to know what Mobile Safari
clients you see being affected.

David

On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 11:11 AM, Thomas Heller <th.hel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Geez, 2277 actually works just fine. 2234 doesn't work, but it actually 
> doesn't work with either closure-library version. Forgot that I reverted to 
> 2234 due to the keyword issue.
>
> 2277 + [org.clojure/google-closure-library "0.0-20140718-946a7d39"]
>
> seems fine, except for that keyword issue.
>
> Sorry about the confusion, I will shut up now until I have something solid.
>
> --
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> To post to this group, send email to clojurescr...@googlegroups.com.
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to