May be the LongAdder in Java8 can beat AtomicLong :D

http://blog.palominolabs.com/2014/02/10/java-8-performance-improvements-longadder-vs-atomiclong/

2014-09-11 17:30 GMT+08:00 Linus Ericsson <oscarlinuserics...@gmail.com>:

> The volatile construct seems very useful in some particular cases! I have
> been missing "ugly-mutable" variables for things such as certain types of
> heaps/queues or write-intensive, slightly probabilistic stuff where one
> missed write doesn't matter that much.
>
> For people who don't have a Java background, I just want to point the very
> useful package java.util.concurrent.atomic, in which one can find gems such
> as AtomicLong, which is almost unbeatable as a counter.
>
> An example in which an AtomicLong is about three times quicker than an
> atom:
>
> https://gist.github.com/claj/6711556#file-countertest-clj
>
> Javadoc for AtomicLong:
>
>
> http://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/api/java/util/concurrent/atomic/AtomicLong.html
>
> In the sake of completeness,
> Linus
>
> 2014-09-11 11:06 GMT+02:00 Frantisek Sodomka <fsodo...@gmail.com>:
>
>> Using my timings macro:
>> https://gist.github.com/fsodomka/5890711
>>
>> I am getting that:
>> - creation & derefing is 60% faster
>> - swapping is 25% faster
>> - resetting is about the same
>>
>>
>> ;;;;;;;;;; volatile vs. atom ;;;;;;;;;;
>>
>> (report
>>   (timings 1e7
>>     (deref (volatile! 42))
>>     (deref (atom 42))))
>>
>> ; |                  :expr |     :time | :ratio | :perc |
>> ; |------------------------+-----------+--------+-------|
>> ; | (deref (volatile! 42)) | 30.688238 |    1.0 | 39.81 |
>> ; |      (deref (atom 42)) | 77.081141 |   2.51 | 100.0 |
>>
>>
>> (report
>>   (let [v (volatile! 42)
>>         a (atom 42)]
>>     (timings 1e7
>>       (vswap! v inc)
>>       (swap! a inc))))
>>
>> ; |          :expr |      :time | :ratio | :perc |
>> ; |----------------+------------+--------+-------|
>> ; | (vswap! v inc) | 136.052946 |    1.0 | 75.08 |
>> ; |  (swap! a inc) | 181.218748 |   1.33 | 100.0 |
>>
>>
>> (report
>>   (let [v (volatile! 42)
>>         a (atom 42)]
>>     (timings 1e7
>>       (vreset! v 10)
>>       (reset! a 10))))
>>
>> ; |          :expr |     :time | :ratio | :perc |
>> ; |----------------+-----------+--------+-------|
>> ; |  (reset! a 10) | 98.755318 |    1.0 | 96.69 |
>> ; | (vreset! v 10) | 102.13944 |   1.03 | 100.0 |
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thursday, September 11, 2014 6:18:08 AM UTC+2, puzzler wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm curious: how much faster are volatiles than atoms?
>>>
>>>  --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
>  --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>



-- 
庄晓丹
Email:        killme2...@gmail.com xzhu...@avos.com
Site:           http://fnil.net
Twitter:      @killme2008

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to