The latter is what I'd consider to be the correct approach. If the do blocks become unwieldy, you can factor them out into functions.
- James On 7 October 2014 02:16, Mike Fikes <[email protected]> wrote: > Here's a style question: If you have to conditionally do one set of side > effects or another set, is your preference to use when and when-not, or > an if containing do blocks? Or perhaps some other construct? > > In terms of a concrete example: > > (let [boolean-value (some-predicate?)] > (when boolean-value > (do-alpha) > (do-beta)) > (when-not boolean-value > (do-gamma) > (do-delta))) > > or: > > (if (some-predicate?) > (do > (do-alpha) > (do-beta)) > (do > (do-gamma) > (do-delta))) > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
