Any "real things" that have been achieved that you'd want to highlight? I'd be interested in porting them to Clojure, possibly using Zelkova, as an exercise in FRP coding.
On Sunday, December 7, 2014 12:29:19 PM UTC+11, raould wrote: > > > From what I understand it's conceptually not ready for anything other > > than toy problems yet. Like Elm's restriction on static flow graphs. > It's > > like programming without 1st class functions, you don't get very far. > > > I am not an Elm user, but I am on the mailing list :-) and I see real > things happening, I guess. So I'm interested to hear more, learn more, > eavesdrop more on any conversation that high-lights what you mean, how > you see the limits. Like, would the Elm folks just disagree from the > get-go since they've apparently made real things with it? > > sincerely. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
