Changing old protocol names should trigger a major revision change in the minimum because it breaks backwards compatibility.
--Ashton Sent from my iPhone > On Dec 27, 2014, at 11:18 AM, Michael Klishin <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> On 27 December 2014 at 19:10:38, Jozef Wagner ([email protected]) wrote: >> clj-time seems to be naming protocols inconsistently. It uses >> ISomething, Something and SomethingProtocol naming. > > I suspect it is because it has 60 contributors and most users never have to > extend the protocols. > > Feel free to submit a PR that standardises all names on Something. > -- > @michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
