I would prefer just Figwheel. Relying only on Figwheel also means you could probably go out with an updated tutorial much sooner.
Thanks, David On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Sebastian Bensusan <sbe...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi David and Dan, > > I edited Om's Basic Tutorial ( > https://github.com/swannodette/om/wiki/Basic-Tutorial) to be used with > Chestnut. Most of the work (not much!) was changing "evaluate in > LightTable" to "save in your text editor". I don't know what the procedure > is for updating a Wiki and having this conversation, *should I open an > issue on Om?* I have it as a standalone repo in case someones wants to > propose a change or make a pull request: > > https://github.com/bensu/basic-om-tut > > Two issues: > > 1. Chestnut 0.6.0 (current stable version) uses Om 0.7.3 and I needed to > deref a cursor inside a go loop in order for things to work. See > https://github.com/swannodette/om/issues/315 and > https://github.com/swannodette/om/commit/92a3e0cf698769fb59bb3744faddaea40b37412d. > Om version is bumped to 0.8.3 beta in v0.7.0-SNAPSHOT-20141226 > > 2. Chestnut's 0.6.0 doesn't reload the index.html (not on save, not on > refresh). The whole process needs to be restarted. See: > https://github.com/plexus/chestnut/issues/84 This was addressed > in v0.7.0-SNAPSHOT-20141207. > > *I would wait until Chestnut 0.7.0 *stable is published in Clojars before > adding this tutorial to the Om Wiki. Otherwise, if you feel the extra > dependency on Chestnut is also too much, I'll fork mies-om and add Figwheel > there for the tutorial. > > After revising this work, I'll move on to the next tutorial. > > Best > > Sebastian Bensusan > > > > On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 5:25:09 PM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote: >> >> I think expecting every last thing to work especially from third parties >> who may be wisely lagging behind is unlikely at least for the near future. >> >> I haven't kept up with Light Table and what issues it may have. Now is >> probably a good time to remove the Light Table centric nature of the Om >> tutorials and switch to a Figwheel based thing that doesn't require >> anything more than your text editor of choice. >> >> The wiki has always been community editable and I would love to see >> people push it forward especially with stuff like this. I will have less >> time for such things as I focus more on Om core and ClojureScript >> enhancements. >> >> David >> >> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Olav Nymoen <ol...@comoyo.com> wrote: >> >>> Just testing clojurescript out so many possible pitfalls on my side here. >>> >>> Does the new javascript externals stuff break lighttables live external >>> browser functionality? >>> >>> Following the basic intro tutorial I cannot get live updates to work. >>> The mies-om om-tut is based on 0.8.4 , and it cannot reference >>> com.facebook.react, while 0.8.6 cannot find cljsjs.react. >>> >>> It compiles nicely with lein, but I can't seem to get the lighttable >>> live REPL stuff to work. >>> >>> Olav >>> >>> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 1:57:19 AM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote: >>> > The only significant change is that Om now relies on the cljsjs.react >>> artifact instead of the one I maintained myself. cljsjs.react has the >>> benefit that usage of React with addons instead of plain React may be >>> configured via Maven in your pom.xml or your project.clj. It's exciting to >>> see that we are already reaping the benefits of :foreign-libs and Maven >>> over existing JavaScript solutions for managing dependencies. >>> > >>> > >>> > This release also includes a fix for a very subtle set-state! bug >>> discovered by Brenton Ashworth. >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > Feedback welcome! >>> > >>> > >>> > https://github.com/swannodette/om >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > David >>> >>> -- >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >>> your first post. >>> --- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "ClojureScript" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com. >>> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. >>> >> >> -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
