On 6 March 2015 at 00:45:47, adrian.med...@mail.yu.edu (adrian.med...@mail.yu.edu) wrote: > it strikes me as odd that this project would not come out of > direct collaboration with Clojure's core contributors.
I should point out that there's enough people in the community who do not find Clojure's core contributors, ahem, exactly open to collaborating on stuff not seen as exciting or important in their circle. > Proposed > features should probably go through the official channels if > you are serious about getting them included in the language. Attempts to introduce major changes to clojure.core have incredibly low chances to succeed for reasons that are outside of control of Dunai's author. A completely new 3rd party project has the same low changes of being *widely* adopted but may influence clojure.core in some areas in the long run and be useful to some today. Or the day it stops being vaporware with a mailing list and no source code publicly available. -- @michaelklishin, github.com/michaelklishin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
