On Mon, Mar 16, 2015 at 2:47 PM, Fluid Dynamics <a2093...@trbvm.com> wrote:
> If that is true, then it is a problem, indicative either of a widespread > lack of discipline among the tool makers or (more likely) a strong need for > some additional well-specified (and maintained!) APIs in the compiler for > tools to hook into. > It's been suggested that the community work on this numerous times and on numerous channels. So far few people have stepped forward to help design, maintain, and document shared tooling entry points. It's also the case that for many users popular and critical ClojureScript tools like cljsbuild are unfortunately considered a blackbox. This means that tooling authors don't get nearly the amount of distributed community effort they deserve for their efforts. As the community comes to grips with the Quick Start and how the ClojureScript compiler actually works people can begin to identify what is fundamental to ClojureScript and what isn't. Until this knowledge becomes more broadly disseminated the tooling state of affairs is not going to improve very quickly. David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
