On Fri, Apr 24, 2015 at 10:14 AM, Steven Deobald <ste...@nilenso.com> wrote:
> I don't have the answer for you, but I'm definitely curious what your use > case is. Whatcha upto? I've become a firm believer in using protocols to encapsulate operations with side effects, but I don't know of any good test-framework-agnostic mocking or stubbing frameworks that work with them. I don't care much for interaction-based (mocking) tests anyway, really, and reification is simple enough that I don't think sugar for stubs buys you much. But it seemed like an open niche and a fun project. If I'm wrong and such a library does exist, please let me know. The library I'm working on doesn't attempt to perform any var replacements, and it doesn't introduce any new syntax; it's simply a mechanism for building fake versions of protocols, with full or partial implementations, that can be passed into functions that require them, and whose state (e.g., the set of calls they've received) can be subsequently inspected. I'd prefer to avoid macros entirely, except that I don't know of any other way to reify on demand. Release coming shortly. Cheers, Brian -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
