>Clojure needs a web framework with more momentum

Some people make a big technology decision based on " TechEmpower Framework
Benchmarks (TFB)" (round10)
[ https://www.techempower.com/blog/2015/04/21/framework-benchmarks-round-10/
]
Should techempower.com framework benchmarks be taken seriously ?

The following clojure frameworks tested by TFB :

Test type: "JSON serialization"
- compojure
- http-kit
- luminus

Test type: "Single query"
- http-kit
- compojure-raw
- luminus-raw
- compojure
- luminus

Test type: "Multiple queries"
-http-kit
-luminus-raw
-compojure
-compojure-raw
-luminus

Test type: "Fortunes"
- compojure
- luminus

Test type: "Data updates"
(nothing)

Test type: "Plaintext"
-compojure -luminus


Regards,
 Imre




2015-05-02 22:43 GMT+02:00 gvim <gvi...@gmail.com>:

> I recently did some research into web frameworks on Github. Here's what I
> found:
>
>
> FRAMEWORK       LANG          CONTRIBUTORS         COMMITS
>
> Luminus        Clojure            28        678
> Caribou        Clojure             2        275
>
> Beego        Golang            99        1522
>
> Phoenix        Elixir              124        1949
>
> Yesod        Haskell           130        3722
>
> Laravel        PHP                268        4421
>
> Play                Scala               417        6085
>
> Symfony        PHP                1130        20914
>
> Rails        Ruby               2691        51000
>
>
> One could conclude from this that the Clojure community isn't that
> interested in web development but the last Clojure survey suggests
> otherwise. Clojure's library composition approach to everything only goes
> so far with large web applications, as Aaron Bedra reminded us in March
> last year: www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBL59w7fXw4 . Less manpower means less
> momentum and more bugs. Furthermore, I have a hunch that Clojure's poor
> adoption as indicated by Indeed.com maybe due to this immaturity in the web
> framework sphere. Why is it that Elixir, with a much smaller community and
> lifespan than Clojure's, has managed to put 4 times as much mindshare into
> its main web framework when its module output, as measured by
> modulecounts.com, is a tiny fraction of Clojure's?
>
> gvim
>
>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to