It will act exactly like transduce if you put a transducer on the input channel.
On Wednesday, May 6, 2015 at 12:26:55 PM UTC-4, Pierre-Yves Ritschard wrote: > > Hi clojure, > > There's a thing I find myself doing often in some of my projects where > I reduce over a core.async channel this way: > > (core.async/reduce update-fn init-state input-channel) > > By doing this on a stream of inbound events. > When looking at doing this with transducers, it's a bit unclear how to fit > the fact that I'm not doing any modification on the input-channel, do you > usually just use identity there ? > > (transduce update-fn identity init-state input) > > Moving to a transducer based approach is tempting, especially since it > would allow for a simpler REPL-based workflow, but I want to make sure I > get this right. > > Cheers! > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
