On Friday, 31 July 2015 11:48:54 UTC+1, Colin Yates wrote: > > I am away from the code at the moment, but is there any reason why the > dynamic connection can’t be private? This goes some way to providing safety. >
No, I don't think there's a problem with it being private, I just didn't think of it and my code to handle transactions is in a different namespace, but it should go in the db namespace anyway and then it can easily made private. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
