Hey, puzzler!
Thanks for the detailed response. Just changing (chan) to (chan n) actually 
worked!
 
I get your displeasure with how 'term' is implemented. 
That's not how I generally code. I'm very new to core.async and was aiming 
for a direct translation of the Go code.

I do get a little carried away with -> at times, though.

Also - though optimization wasn't a priority, thanks for taking out the 
time to show alternate approaches along with their use cases. 
I haven't tried reducers yet, so that was new.

I have one more question, though: how does one work in ClojureScript 
without <!! ?

- Divyansh

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to