Hi, That's not the same function as #(last (sort %&)) > The equivalent would be (comp last sort vec)
Could you please explain why is the `vec` needed? From what I understand, we are expected to treat the variadic args argument as a seq, nothing more. On Thursday, 13 August 2015 14:02:38 UTC+5:30, Herwig Hochleitner wrote: > > 2015-08-13 10:08 GMT+02:00 Eric Le Goff <ele...@gmail.com <javascript:>>: > >> I would be curious to know if there are difference (in terms of >> performance / elegance ) between those 2 ways of expressing functions >> >> E.g >> >> *(fn [& x] (-> x sort last))* >> >> versus >> >> *#(last (sort %&))* >> >> Both are supposedly equivalent, but would you recommend one preferred >> syntax , or this just a matter of personal style ? >> > > #() is for very short functions, mostly just one-liners, where the (fn []) > would add significant noise. > The line is blurry and a matter of taste; upper limit is when you need a > nested fn, since #(#()) is not possible. > Performance is equivalent, since #() desugars into (fn [..]). > > 2015-08-13 10:14 GMT+02:00 Erik Assum <er...@assum.net <javascript:>>: > >> (comp last sort) >> > > That's not the same function as #(last (sort %&)) > The equivalent would be (comp last sort vec) > > cheers > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
