Great! ☺ Bring it up on the cider gitter room. On 23 Sep 2015 3:55 pm, "Phillip Lord" <phillip.l...@russet.org.uk> wrote:
> Artur Malabarba <arturmalaba...@gmail.com> writes: > >> > > Yes, that's what the current (but unmerged) implementation does. :) > > > >> If this cache were persisted between Emacs sessions then the problem > >> largely goes away. > >> > > Yes, that's very plausible to do. > > I am happy to do the implementation for this (i.e. the persistance!), > given that I am raising the problem, if that would be a help. > > Phil > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.