Great! ☺ Bring it up on the cider gitter room.
On 23 Sep 2015 3:55 pm, "Phillip Lord" <phillip.l...@russet.org.uk> wrote:

> Artur Malabarba <arturmalaba...@gmail.com> writes:
> >>
> > Yes, that's what the current (but unmerged) implementation does. :)
> >
> >> If this cache were persisted between Emacs sessions then the problem
> >> largely goes away.
> >>
> > Yes, that's very plausible to do.
>
> I am happy to do the implementation for this (i.e. the persistance!),
> given that I am raising the problem, if that would be a help.
>
> Phil
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to