"Mastering Clojure Macros" by Colin Jones gets my vote as the go to book
for writing clojure macros.


On Fri, Oct 2, 2015 at 8:24 AM, Colin Yates <colin.ya...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Thanks for your comments - very helpful!
>
> The reference to destructuring might be irrelevant now. Previously I
> noticed that the _map construction_ was emitted from the macro rather than
> the symbol bound to the map. For example, some variation of quoting meant
> (defmacro a [m] (println m)) called with (a {:1 1}) emitted (println {:1
> 1}) rather than (println m). Now I think about it is because an earlier
> iteration of the macro used ~m - I’m not at the desk so I can’t confirm.
>
> Any pointers a decent Clojure macro book? I found lots of blogs around
> from google but not a single one of them mentioned the (let [m-state
> (gensym)] `(let [~m-state ~state])) ‘trick’.
>
> Thanks again.
>
> On 2 Oct 2015, at 10:50, gianluca torta <giato...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Colin,
>
> as far as I can tell, your solution looks fine... here are a couple of
> comments on your step-by-step analysis
>
> cheers,
> Gianluca
>
>
> 1(defmacro form [state & elements]
>> 2  (let [m-state (gensym)]
>> 3    `(let [~m-state ~state]
>> 4       [:div.form.horizontal
>> 5        ~@(map (fn [[f m & rest]]
>> 6                 `[~f (assoc ~m
>> 7                             :value (get @(:values ~m-state) (:id ~m))
>> 8                             :on-change #(swap! (:values ~m-state) assoc
>> (:id ~m) "UPDATED"))
>> 9                   ~@rest])
>> 10               elements)])))
>>
>> 0 - ` means "emit, don't evaluate", ~@ means "splice, e.g. remove the
>> outer sequence so [a ~@[1 2]] becomes [a 1 2] and ' means 'the symbol of
>> rather than the value of'.
>>
> ~@ means "evaluate and splice", i.e., it overrides the "don't evaluate" of
> ` and splices the result in the outer sequence
> ~ means just "evaluate" without the splicing
>
>
>> 2 - declare m-state, which is lexically scoped to the macro and is bound
>> to a random identifier created by gensym
>> 3 - the back-tick (syntax-quote) returns the form rather than evaluating
>> the form, so the macro will return (let* [m-8_324230_ ....]) The [~m-state
>> ~state] is just bewildering though.
>> 3 - in addition, the 'state' argument appears to be destructured, but
>> only to one level so if the state contains an atom it is the var of the atom
>>
> 'state' is evaluated due to ~, not sure what you mean by 'destructured,
> but only to one level'
>
>
>> 4 - literal text emitted in-line
>> 5 - splice the results of the map (i.e. rather than [:div.form.horizontal
>> [child1 child2]] return [:div.form.horizontal child1 child2])
>> 5 - also destructure each element assuming [f m(ap) and 0 or more other
>> args]
>>
> yes, the destructuring is just a normal destructuring of the args passed
> to the fn by map
>
>
>> 6 - emit [<f> where <f> is the first symbol, 'f' l in each element. Also
>> prevent this being evaluated in the macro with the syntax-quote as (5) has
>> introduced some new scope because of the ~@ - not sure.
>>
> as said above, rather than introducing a new scope, ~@ just overrides the
> "don't evaluate" of back-tick
>
>
>> 6 - also associate onto the symbol m (which is assumed to be associative,
>> e.g. a map)...
>> 7/8 - extract data out of the 'run-time' (e.g. not macro-time) value of
>> the provided state (magically captured under ~m-state)
>> 9 - splice in the rest of the arguments, if any, that were part of the
>> element
>> 10 - and do that magic for each element
>>
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to