Great to hear! Let me know if there are any questions I can answer.
Feedback gratefully accepted.

Cheers,

Brian

On Mon, Oct 5, 2015 at 11:56 AM, James Reeves <ja...@booleanknot.com> wrote:

> Very nice. I was looking for something like this.
>
> - James
>
> On 5 October 2015 at 15:14, Brian Guthrie <btguth...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Clojure protocols are a great way to encapsulate operations with side
>> effects, but suffer from a lack of general test tooling. Shrubbery provides
>> a small set of basic building blocks for working with them:
>>
>>  * stub, which accepts a variable list of protocols and a optional
>> hashmap of simple value implementations and returns an object that reifies
>> all given protocols;
>>  * spy, which accepts an object with at least one protocol
>> implementation and returns a new implementation that tracks the number of
>> times each of its members were called;
>>  * mock, which wraps a stub in a spy, allowing callers to supply basic
>> function implementations and assert against those calls; and
>>  * calls/received?, which in conjunction with the Matcher protocol
>> provide a way to query spies and assert against their state.
>>
>> Shrubbery is test-framework-agnostic, avoids altering runtime state to
>> the degree possible, and uses no macros. It should work nicely with
>> refactorings like rename-function.
>>
>> https://github.com/bguthrie/shrubbery
>>
>> [com.gearswithingears/shrubbery "0.3.0"]
>>
>>
>> New in this release:
>>
>> – Support for multiple protocols in both spies and stubs.
>> – Spies attempt to automatically derive the given implementation's
>> protocols, and tracks calls to all of them. (This behavior can be
>> overridden.)
>> – Replaced all macros with plain functions. (Unfortunately, this means
>> leaning on eval in some cases.)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
>> your first post.
>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
>> For more options, visit this group at
>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>> ---
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Clojure" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
>> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>>
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to