In no way did I want to criticize your awesome library None taken!
I'll see if I can expand on the documentation. Thank you! I’m not great at documentation, never have been (one of my first jobs, they hired a technical writer to turn my attempt at documentation into something usable…), so I’m always very grateful when the community submit improvements to any documentation I’ve provided. However, I was very surprised seeing the performance differences in queries. On selecting 100K of separate unids on SQL server it was 55 seconds vs. 33 seconds using query vs. reused prepared query, and only 360ms of these 55s were spent in prepare-statement. The result set processing was identical. I had always assumed normal execution plan caching for parametrized queries would be almost just as effective, but 60% is no small difference. I’m not actually too surprised at this. It’ll be very dependent on your database, your configuration, your driver, and your particular query. Unfortunately. Sean -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
