That's what I was thinking... I may try to put together a patch.
But it may have to wait until after Clojure/Conj! Still don't have presentation finished... H On Tuesday, 10 November 2015 16:26:58 UTC, Alex Miller wrote: > > Persistent sets are really persistent maps under the hood, so in principle > doesn't seem like there's any reason that shouldn't work. > > On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 10:23:19 AM UTC-6, retnuH wrote: >> >> Hi there, I was playing with reducers recently, and was wondering why >> PersistentSets aren't foldable (i.e. don't take advantage of the Fork/Join >> stuff? >> >> Is there some fundamental reason why it wouldn't work (or is especially >> difficult), or just a case that no one has gotten around to implementing it? >> >> Cheers, >> >> H >> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.