Oh; and nice work Mike! :-) Chris
On Wednesday, November 11, 2015 at 8:48:22 AM UTC-8, Christopher Small wrote: > > If you haven't tried it in a while, you may want to look again. They've > created an alternate API or mode which is more functional/immutable. > Perhaps that _is_ what you saw though, and you're just referring to the > mutable Java underpinnings leaking through... > > My 2c > > Chris > > > On Tuesday, November 10, 2015 at 12:22:01 PM UTC-8, Mars0i wrote: >> >> Cool. Thanks. I experimented with the quil >> <https://github.com/quil/quil> wrapper around Processing >> <https://processing.org/> at one point. I'm glad quil exists, but the >> underlying non-functional-programming model of Processing can sometimes >> make it awkward. >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
