Also just like the CLJ-1846 issue, this bit of code was valid pre 1.8 > On 12 Nov 2015, at 19:14, Nicola Mometto <brobro...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Depends on how you look at it. > From my point of view, both examples are using an otherwise valid type hint, > at an invalid location, and in both cases the emitted code is nonsensical. > So I'd say that if the decision for the CLJ-1846 issue was to handle that > with a compile time error, this one should too. > > >> On 12 Nov 2015, at 16:47, Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com >> <mailto:a...@puredanger.com>> wrote: >> >> Neither is acceptable, so I either misunderstand or disagree with your >> question. :) >> >> The code below is an invalid type hint at that location. Are you maybe >> saying this should throw an error on definition? >> >> CLJ-1846 is instead a valid type hint that is in conflict with the call. >> Which now throws an error. >> >> >> On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 10:13:13 AM UTC-6, Nicola Mometto wrote: >> This is :rettag in action. >> Any reason why this error should be acceptable while the CLJ-1846 one isn't? >> >>> On 12 Nov 2015, at 12:55, Alex Miller <a...@puredanger.com >>> <mailto:a...@puredanger.com>> wrote: >>> >>> That's not a valid type hint. Var meta is evaluated, in this case to the >>> double function object. You really want: >>> >>> (defn timespi ^double [^double x] (* x 3.14)) >>> >>> >>> On Thursday, November 12, 2015 at 3:57:44 AM UTC-6, rebor...@gmail.com >>> <mailto:rebor...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> the following stops executing on 1.8.0-rc1 or current master-head >>> (9448d627e091bc010e68e05a5669c134cd715a98, 1.8-RC1 plus Rich fix for >>> CLJ-1846): >>> >>> [/Users/reborg]$ repl >>> Clojure 1.8.0-master-SNAPSHOT >>> user=> (defn ^double timespi [^double x] (* x 3.14)) >>> #'user/timespi >>> user=> (timespi 2) >>> AbstractMethodError Method user$timespi.invokePrim(D)Ljava/lang/Object; is >>> abstract user/timespi (NO_SOURCE_FILE:-1) >>> >>> It works if you enable direct linking (or if you use 1.7.0). >>> >>> Renzo >> >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com> >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >> first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> <http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en> >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >> <mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout >> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>. >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
