Hi Adrian,

with your suggestion it certainly works also with avec'

however, I still don't see why the original code from Burt works with avec 
and does not work with avec'

cheers,
Gianluca

On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:06:02 PM UTC+1, adrian...@mail.yu.edu 
wrote:
>
> You need to quote the entire vector `avec`, because otherwise the function 
> you want to bind to `foo` will be evaluated before being evaluated by the 
> `let` special operator, which expects only standard readable object 
> literals to be embedded.  
>
> Try changing:
>
> (def avec
>   ['p   true
>   'foo (fn [x] (+ 2 x))])
>
>
> to:
>
>
> (def avec
>   '[p   true
>     foo (fn [x] (+ 2 x))])
>
>
> On Thursday, January 14, 2016 at 5:05:55 AM UTC-5, Burt wrote:
>>
>> Hi, 
>>
>> I got an exception using eval and I do not understand why!
>> Can anybody explain what happens?
>>
>> Here is a small piece of code showing the problem:
>>
>> (defn eval-phi [avec phi]
>>   (eval `(let ~avec ~phi)))
>>
>> ; The idea of eval-phi is the evaluation of
>> ; arbitrary lists where the symbols are
>> ; defined in avec
>>
>> ; example:
>> ; in avec the symbol p is defined as true
>> ; and the symbol foo as a function adding 2
>>
>> (def avec
>>   ['p   true
>>   'foo (fn [x] (+ 2 x))])
>>
>> ; here are two lists
>> (def phi '(and p (= 7 (foo 5))))
>> (def psi '(and (not p) (= 7 (foo 5))))
>>
>> ; and here their evaluation
>> (eval-phi avec phi)
>> ; => true
>> (eval-phi avec psi)
>> ; => false
>>
>> ; second approach:
>> ; the attempt to give the definition of a
>> ; function in avec by a function which
>> ; returns a function leads to an exception:
>>
>> (defn make-adder [n]
>>   (fn [x] (+ n x)))
>>
>> ((make-adder 2) 5)
>> ; => 7
>>
>> ; here the second definition of a binding vector:
>> (def avec'
>>   ['p true
>>    'foo (make-adder 2)])
>>
>> (eval-phi avec' phi)
>> ; CompilerException java.lang.ExceptionInInitializerError
>>
>> ; in my mental model of the substitution of symbols by 
>> ; their value there should be no difference between the
>> ; first approach and the second.
>>
>> ; Actually avec' contains the function returned by make-adder
>> ((nth avec' 3) 5)
>> ; => 7
>>
>> ; Why does avec' leads to an exception?
>>
>>
>> *Kind regards,*
>>
>> *Burkhardt Renz*
>>
>>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to