As I’m watching Michael Drogalis’s Clojure/Conj 2015 presentation “Onyx: Distributed Computing for Clojure” <https://youtube.com/watch?v=YlfA8hFs2HY&t=734>, I'm distracted by a nagging worry that we —as a community— are somehow falling into the same trap as the those advocating XML in the early 2000s. That said, it's a very *vague* unease, because I don’t know much about why the industry seems to have rejected XML as “bad”; by the time I started programming professionally there was already a consensus that XML sucked, and that libraries/frameworks that relied heavily on XML configuration files were to be regarded with suspicion and/or distaste.
So, am I incorrect in seeing a similarity between the “data > code” mentality and the rise of XML? Or, assuming there is a legitimate parallel, is it perhaps unnecessary to be alarmed? Does the tendency to use edn instead of XML sidestep everything that went wrong in the 2000s? Or is it the case that the widespread backlash against XML threw a baby out with the bathwater, forgetting the advantages of data over code? Cheers, Josh -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
