+1 > On Feb 15, 2016, at 2:29 PM, Paul L. Snyder <p...@pataprogramming.com> wrote: > > On Mon, 15 Feb 2016, Gregg Reynolds wrote: > >> On Feb 11, 2016 6:19 AM, "Aysylu Greenberg" <aysy...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> I'm pleased to announce that Paul Snyder >> (@pataprogramming, pataprogramming on Github) has joined me in maintaining >> Loom. I'm excited for the coming year for Loom, with more excellent >> contributions accepted faster. >> >> Your Readme doesn't even bother to say what loom is. > > Hi, Gregg, > > Thanks for pointing out an area where additional clarification would be > helpful to potential users of Loom. > > Who is the 'you' that this criticism is intended to address? Aysylu, who's > been serving as maintainer for this library over the last years? Justin, > who originally created it? The over two dozen contributors who have helped > build its functionality? Suggesting that they didn't "even bother" with > something is, frankly, rude and unproductive. > > I'm happy we don't see much of this sort of casual disrespect in the > Clojure community (with the exception of occasional bad actors on the > mailing list). The worst of what we do see is, largely, aimed at those who > contribute the most: the team that maintains Clojure itself. > > People who are willing to invest their time to make and share useful tools > are a resource. They should be allowed to direct their energy toward making > those tools better, rather than having it drained by jerky interactions. > Whether we find a project personally useful or not, we owe Open Source > authors, at a minimum, politeness. This is at least partially in our own > interest: we want them to keep making those tools, rather than burning out > and switching to a more rewarding activity. > > Here's an article on framing feedback in a less confrontational and > accusatory manner. > > http://personalexcellence.co/blog/constructive-criticism/ > > "Thanks for sharing Loom. There's a lot of information in the README, but > I found it difficult to figure out what the library actually does. It > would be helpful to have a concise, up-front description of its purpose." > > Regards, > Paul > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Clojure" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
