It may, however keep in mind that Clojure supports Java 1.6+ and Stream was added in 1.8. That's not an impossible hurdle, but it might make sense to make longer before hurdling it.
On Tuesday, February 23, 2016 at 11:03:55 AM UTC-6, 676c7...@gmail.com wrote: > > Hello! > > For interoperation with Java, Clojure’s seq supports the Iterable > interface directly, which means that all Java collections are > automatically seqable. seq also supports the CharSequence and > java.util.Map interfaces, and arrays too. > > Would it make sense to have seq also support java.util.stream.Stream? > Streams are just as important an abstraction as collections, and I > believe that stream-producing APIs are becoming more and more common. It > would be nice if Clojure supported it out of the box. > > An example (context: http://stackoverflow.com/q/35574155): > > (->> (.splitAsStream #"\s+" "one two three") > (remove #(clojure.string/includes? % "o")) > (map clojure.string/upper-case) > first) > > Thanks, > > > -- > David > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
