hey Jozef, would you mind sharing a blog post or piece of documentation where I can learn about those strategies? The only one that I know so far is the local primitives for fast arithmetic, but besides from that I haven't heard of any ther optimization for loop/recur strategy :/
El viernes, 29 de abril de 2016, 13:21:47 (UTC+2), Jozef Wagner escribió: > > There are many ways on how you can improve the performance of loop/recur, > and most of them depends on the type of a thing you are iterating through. > With reducers (and transducers), the iteration part is decoupled from the > reduction part, so they offer a mechanism that chooses the optimal > iteration strategy for the collection that is passed in. > > On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 12:46 PM, Camilo Roca <car...@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > >> >> I have been hearing a lot of Clojure's use of an internalReduce protocol, >> which seems to speed up things when using reduce. >> Now the thing is that a lot of people also claim that tail-call-recursion >> is also pretty fast, which lets me wondering: >> >> - if I could replace a loop/recur with an equivalent reduce/reduced >> approach, do I see performance gains? >> >> Obviously the immediate answer is just "benchmark it", but so far I >> haven't found an stable solution to this question. The benchmark seems to >> go sometimes for loop/recur and some others for reduce/reduced. I also know >> that when doing primitive math, loop/recur performs better than >> reduce/reduced, but I was wondering in which cases (regardless of idiomatic >> or nor) would a reduce approach be preferred over a loop/recur? >> >> Any thoughts on this? >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com >> <javascript:> >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >> --- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Clojure" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
