In a similar vein, do you think that eductions are generally a better idea 
than lazy sequences/for comprehensions?

On Sunday, 8 May 2016 22:24:15 UTC-7, Herwig Hochleitner wrote:
>
> My theory has been, that transducer stacks inline much better, hence allow 
> for more optimizations by the jit.
> In particular I suspect that escape analysis works better on them, so the 
> compiler can even move some of the remaining allocations to the stack.
>
> To verify this, try running with -verbose:gc and with either 
> -XX:-DoEscapeAnalysis then -XX:+DoEscapeAnalysis
>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to