The taoensso.encore issue has defeated my attempts so far to create a repro case. Kevin Downey also confirmed that the straightforward cases of using Encore with 1.9.0 Alpha 5 all seem to work. I worked around the issue so we can continue testing Alpha 5 at World Singles (lifting a defn out of a do). I’ll keep digging into that and report back with my findings – clearly it’s not an issue with Alpha 5 per se and doesn’t appear to be an issue with Encore directly, so it’s some weird interaction in our dependencies or toolchain somewhere…
Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood On 6/7/16, 3:39 PM, "Sean Corfield" <s...@corfield.org> wrote: I ran across it because CongoMongo uses it and we use that. It’s not a big deal. Taoensso.encore is more problematic since that is essentially broken by the addition of bytes? to clojure.core. Right now that’s blocking us from upgrading but I haven’t established a workaround yet (technically it breaks taoensso.nippy’s use of encore). Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood On 6/7/16, 12:01 PM, "Alex Miller" <clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of a...@puredanger.com> wrote: I'm not opposed to it but can't say that's anywhere on my priority list. Does anyone use incubator? On Tuesday, June 7, 2016 at 1:21:34 PM UTC-5, Sean Corfield wrote: An excellent set of new predicates – thank you! Will clojure.core.incubator get a new release to reflect that seqable? is available in core? WARNING: seqable? already refers to: #'clojure.core/seqable? in namespace: clojure.core.incubator, being replaced by: #'clojure.core.incubator/seqable? Sean Corfield -- (904) 302-SEAN An Architect's View -- http://corfield.org/ "If you're not annoying somebody, you're not really alive." -- Margaret Atwood On 6/7/16, 10:38 AM, "Alex Miller" <clojure@googlegroups.com on behalf of a...@puredanger.com> wrote: Clojure 1.9.0-alpha5 is now available. Try it via - Download: https://repo1.maven.org/maven2/org/clojure/clojure/1.9.0-alpha5 - Leiningen: [org.clojure/clojure "1.9.0-alpha5"] 1.9.0-alpha4 includes the following changes since 1.9.0-alpha4: Fixes: - doc was printing "Spec" when none existed - fix ? explain New predicates in core (all also now have built-in generator support in spec): - seqable? - boolean? - long?, pos-long?, neg-long?, nat-long? - double?, bigdec? - ident?, simple-ident?, qualified-ident? - simple-symbol?, qualified-symbol? - simple-keyword?, qualified-keyword? - bytes? (for byte[]) - indexed? - inst? (and new inst-ms) - uuid? - uri? New in spec: - unform - given a spec and a conformed value, returns the unconformed value - New preds: long-in-range?, inst-in-range? - New specs (with gen support): long-in, inst-in, double-in -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
