2016-08-20 21:43 GMT+02:00 Matching Socks <phill.w...@gmail.com>: > > Could the same effect be obtained without the global state of namespace > mappings? Do all uses of clojure.data.xml in an app, even fully > encapsulated uses, have to agree about the keyword for any given well-known > XML namespace URI? >
Currently, that is the case. The motivation is to ensure value-equality for parse trees within an application. Do you have a compelling use case for passing the namespace mapping into the parse call? -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
