I do not think your tone and lack of constructive feedback to Alex's (and others) thoughtful responses is helping your case.
On Wednesday, August 24, 2016 at 8:46:47 PM UTC-4, Brian Marick wrote: > > > On Aug 24, 2016, at 8:39 AM, Stuart Halloway <stuart....@gmail.com > <javascript:>> wrote: > > 3. "Follow the inverted pyramid so people see what is most important." > This kind of thing is easily done in a layer above spec, e.g. a custom > REPL printer for spec macro errors. Worth working on but not critical to > getting spec right. > > > So why not do it in the bottom layer? Is there some deep reason why only > an unserious programmer would want information in anything other than the > current clojure.spec order? (We’re talking here about reordering a list.) > > There has been a notable lack of “yeah, we might have made a sub-optimal > decision” in this discussion. It looks bad, in my opinion. Has looked bad > for a long time. > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
