Thanks, both of you, for the extra background there. On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:44:34 AM UTC-6, Alex Miller wrote: > > From prior conversations, Rich is not in favor of the preference approach > for protocols. I'm not sure what he has in mind as an alternative though. > > On Wednesday, December 21, 2016 at 9:29:14 AM UTC-6, Nicola Mometto wrote: >> >> Something like what I proposed in >> http://dev.clojure.org/jira/browse/CLJ-1807 would help solve this >> ambiguity >> >>
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
