Yeah, I was thinking about logging the ticket for it. I just figured I'd discuss it on the google groups first to see if anyone else thought it was a useful concern. It seems that some people have opinions on in it in both directions perhaps, i.e. docs are sufficient vs docs are not sufficient.
On Thursday, December 29, 2016 at 5:50:14 PM UTC-6, Matching Socks wrote: > > How about a ticket for enhancement of the API documentation to clarify > the nature of distinct's parameter (any seqable, even lazy)? That would > distinguish it from, e.g., (dedupe (sort coll)). > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
