This is great stuff! :)
On Tue, Jan 21, 2014 at 2:22 PM, David Pidcock <eraz0rh...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Sure. I have a version @ > > https://gist.github.com/anonymous/8546161 > > Note - this is om 0.1.7 compatible. I have yet to update it to 0.2+ > > Also, I am still learning myself, so I'm not certain I'd call it > "idiomatic" of anything, yet. > > Many thanks to David Nolen for his example sortable (many of the functions > are lifted as-is from there). > > The main difference in this approach is that it's intended to be a "bolt > on" feature. The containing component (the "main app", if you will) just > calls a couple of functions during initial setup and update etc and it's > all externalized. > > Subcomponents then "subscribe" for drag events within their bounds with > another function, and this allows us to drag and drop between different > components with the same event channels. > > Drop handlers use a "command channel" to send a higher level command back > to the main component, which mutates the app-state according to whatever > business logic you'd like. > > Theoretically, the drop handlers could mutate the state at the > subcomponent level, but I prefer to centralize this at the main-app, in > case some kind of inter-component coordination is required. It also means > all the drag functions can be re-used very easily. > > There are no doubt many ways this could be improved, and I'm exploring > several options, including injecting pre-filtering logic at the main app > level so that I can support drag-exit and drag-enter style events. > > > > On Monday, January 20, 2014 10:16:02 PM UTC-8, vladislav p wrote: > > @David P, > > Would you be able to share your code samples on githubs or ghist > > I am slowly venturingin in to this stack and would appreciate to see D&D > and other examples showing idiomatic use with Om. > > > > thank you in advance > > > > > > On Monday, January 13, 2014 6:23:44 PM UTC-5, David Pidcock wrote: > > > Perfect. > > > > > > That worked wonders. I just had to thread the owner into the > filter-fn, instead of the bounds by themselves. Still learning to think > declaratively, obviously. > > > > > > No more channel churn. > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
