goog.typeOf should probably be goog/typeOf. David
On Sun, Jun 8, 2014 at 8:08 AM, Colin Fleming <colin.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Another one - I've seen some forms like (goog.typeOf x), which implies that > JS root objects can be used directly? This is something I haven't seen > documented anywhere. > > > On 8 June 2014 21:55, Colin Fleming <colin.mailingl...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> Hi all, >> >> I'm working on CLJS symbol resolution for Cursive. There are a lot of >> corners where it's hard to figure out from the doc how they should work - >> I've looked through the code but I'm not sure I've got it all right. >> >> I've seen several times in the group here that / should only be used for >> CLJS namespaces, never for JS properties. So (Array/isArray ...) should be >> (js/Array.isArray ...) instead. Is this correct? ClojureScript: Up and >> running states that / can be used for JS module objects, which I take to >> mean root-level objects - their example is (Raphael/color....) from the >> Raphael JS library. Their discussion of the differences in this-binding is >> confusing since it seems that / should be used for JS but only in the case >> of top-level objects. >> confirm-ns in analyzer.clj contains a list of namespaces which should not >> warn, i.e. which are implicitly required, as I understand it (cljs.core, >> goog, Math, goog.string). CLJS itself contains examples like (Math/floor...) >> - does this mean that JS module objects are considered namespaces? Is this >> true of provide'd Google Closure namespaces (e.g. goog.string, which is also >> used like this in the CLJS source)? >> Using e.g. :include-macros, it's possible to have the same alias refer >> both to a CLJS and CLJ namespace simultaneously. I'm assuming that in this >> case, if a symbol name were to conflict, that the macro form would take >> precedence in the head of a list (since macroexpansion happens before >> evaluation) but the CLJS form would take precedence everywhere else. Is this >> correct? >> I'm assuming that my-namespace.cljs does not implicitly refer macros from >> my-namespace.clj - is this correct? >> >> Thanks for any clarification! >> >> Cheers, >> >> Colin > > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
