Hi Julien, headless tests probably fall into the category of advanced configuration but I'd consider creating a "standard" configuration for it if we can achieve consensus on how that should look and work.
I basically test my CLJS code the way ClojureScript does itself [1,2] which can hardly be called unit testing but there were no tools when I started and too lazy to switch ever since. I would not recommend that approach, I did not look into clojurescript.test enough to comment. /thomas [1] https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/master/test/cljs/test_runner.cljs [2] https://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/blob/master/test/cljs/cljs/core_test.cljs On Wednesday, December 3, 2014 2:41:27 PM UTC+1, Julien Eluard wrote: > Hi Thomas, > > congrats! This looks like a great step forward for shadow-build! I always > have been curious about it but never invested the time to test. > > One thing lein-cljsbuild can help with is running headless tests (using > phantomjs for instance). Is that something you are considering? > > Julien -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
