I assume it depends on Google closure compiler. Unless this is something that optimization none would avail of, but I don't see why it would.
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:37 Robin Ricard <[email protected]> wrote: > Maybe Traceur Compiler[1] could be used to keep backward compatibility > with older browsers. But if the work needed to get ES6 ready is bigger than > the benefits it could give, that may not be worth it. > > [1]: https://github.com/google/traceur-compiler > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
