Sure, I'll explore Figwheel's new REPL and add that instead.

What about adding/configuring Figwheel? Should it be step by step inside the 
tutorial, from mies-om to mies-om + Figwheel? Or it should just start with a 
ready to go template "mies-om-wheel"?

Thanks

Sebastian Bensusan

On Saturday, January 31, 2015 at 1:26:34 AM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote:
> I would prefer just Figwheel. Relying only on Figwheel also means you could 
> probably go out with an updated tutorial much sooner.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> David
> 
> 
> On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 4:10 PM, Sebastian Bensusan <sbe...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> Hi David and Dan,
> 
> I edited Om's Basic Tutorial 
> (https://github.com/swannodette/om/wiki/Basic-Tutorial) to be used with 
> Chestnut. Most of the work (not much!) was changing "evaluate in LightTable" 
> to "save in your text editor". I don't know what the procedure is for 
> updating a Wiki and having this conversation, should I open an issue on Om? I 
> have it as a standalone repo in case someones wants to propose a change or 
> make a pull request:
> 
> 
> https://github.com/bensu/basic-om-tut
> 
> 
> 
> Two issues:
> 
> 
> 1. Chestnut 0.6.0 (current stable version) uses Om 0.7.3 and I needed to 
> deref a cursor inside a go loop in order for things to work. See 
> https://github.com/swannodette/om/issues/315 and 
> https://github.com/swannodette/om/commit/92a3e0cf698769fb59bb3744faddaea40b37412d.
>  Om version is bumped to 0.8.3 beta in v0.7.0-SNAPSHOT-20141226
> 
> 
> 2. Chestnut's 0.6.0 doesn't reload the index.html (not on save, not on 
> refresh). The whole process needs to be restarted. See: 
> https://github.com/plexus/chestnut/issues/84 This was addressed in 
> v0.7.0-SNAPSHOT-20141207.
> 
> 
> I would wait until Chestnut 0.7.0 stable is published in Clojars before 
> adding this tutorial to the Om Wiki. Otherwise, if you feel the extra 
> dependency on Chestnut is also too much, I'll fork mies-om and add Figwheel 
> there for the tutorial.
> 
> 
> After revising this work, I'll move on to the next tutorial.
> 
> 
> Best
> 
> 
> Sebastian Bensusan
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 5:25:09 PM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote:
> I think expecting every last thing to work especially from third parties who 
> may be wisely lagging behind is unlikely at least for the near future.
> 
> 
> I haven't kept up with Light Table and what issues it may have. Now is 
> probably a good time to remove the Light Table centric nature of the Om 
> tutorials and switch to a Figwheel based thing that doesn't require anything 
> more than your text editor of choice.
> 
> 
> The wiki has always been community editable and I would love to see people 
> push it forward especially with stuff like this. I will have less time for 
> such things as I focus more on Om core and ClojureScript enhancements.
> 
> 
> 
> David
> 
> 
> On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 10:46 AM, Olav Nymoen <ol...@comoyo.com> wrote:
> Just testing clojurescript out so many possible pitfalls on my side here.
> 
> 
> 
> Does the new javascript externals stuff break lighttables live external 
> browser functionality?
> 
> 
> 
> Following the basic intro tutorial I cannot get live updates to work. The 
> mies-om om-tut is based on 0.8.4 , and it cannot reference 
> com.facebook.react, while 0.8.6 cannot find cljsjs.react.
> 
> 
> 
> It compiles nicely with lein, but I can't seem to get the lighttable live 
> REPL stuff to work.
> 
> 
> 
> Olav
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> On Tuesday, January 27, 2015 at 1:57:19 AM UTC+1, David Nolen wrote:
> 
> > The only significant change is that Om now relies on the cljsjs.react 
> > artifact instead of the one I maintained myself. cljsjs.react has the 
> > benefit that usage of React with addons instead of plain React may be 
> > configured via Maven in your pom.xml or your project.clj. It's exciting to 
> > see that we are already reaping the benefits of :foreign-libs and Maven 
> > over existing JavaScript solutions for managing dependencies.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > This release also includes a fix for a very subtle set-state! bug 
> > discovered by Brenton Ashworth.
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > Feedback welcome!
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > https://github.com/swannodette/om
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> >
> 
> > David
> 
> 
> 
> --
> 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> 
> ---
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "ClojureScript" group.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojurescrip...@googlegroups.com.
> 
> To post to this group, send email to clojur...@googlegroups.com.
> 
> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> 
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> 
> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
> 
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
> first post.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> 
> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com
> 
> For more options, visit this group at
> 
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> 
> --- 
> 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Clojure" group.
> 
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to clojure+u...@googlegroups.com.
> 
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

-- 
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"ClojureScript" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.

Reply via email to