Wow! I'm literally hacking on a little project called `entangle` ;) which keeps remote atoms in sync using websockets, core.async.
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 4:16 PM Marc Fawzi <[email protected]> wrote: > Thank you for coming back to this ... I got busy in between the time I > naively engaged you on that thread and have not had the chance to dig into > what you were proposing but now Clojure and related concepts are far less > foreign to me and I'll certainly be reading your proposed change and > discussing it with the current maintainers in the Reagent org as well as > Dan himself (hopefully! I know he just answered a whole bunch of issues) > > btw, I love the connotation with quantum entanglement (if that was > intentional) > > > > > On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 3:52 PM, Frozenlock <[email protected]> wrote: > >> You might be interested in a quick look at: >> https://github.com/Frozenlock/entanglement >> >> I wrote it after working on reagent-cursors and seeing a pattern emerge. >> >> The main purpose is to have an abstraction layer between the data and the >> application (IE Reagent). >> This way you can decouple how Reagent is written and how your data is >> stored in an atom. >> >> (Related Reagent issue: >> https://github.com/reagent-project/reagent/issues/92) >> >> >> On Tuesday, May 5, 2015 at 7:47:02 PM UTC-4, marc fawzi wrote: >>> >>> So after a couple of months drooling over ClojureScript's more advanced >>> facilities, I've finally managed to play with Protocols and Records. >>> >>> It feels a bit OO-ish me, but can't see how I could survive without >>> it.... >>> >>> Is this really functional programming or did I subconsciously revert to >>> OO? >>> >>> PowerCursors >>> >>> >>> https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/0090a95b6b4f9c12c070 >>> >>> >>> The previous version was a weaker abstraction which used multi-methods ( >>> https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/2b3aa1594ce707227b96) and is very >>> amateur in retrospect so I'm hoping the next version will be that much >>> better... >>> >>> This one doesn't even >>> >>> If you have any feedback for this n00b please don't hesitate to share >>> here. >>> >>> Btw, all of this digging and exploring because of one comment at our >>> last SF Reagent meetup that cursors were just simple pointers. The latest >>> abstraction doesn't even use any cursor per se but invents it's own simple >>> yet more robust lensing pattern. >>> >>> Thank you for all your help answering my often ridiculous questions. >>> >>> Marc >>> p.s. the last meetup's video IS coming this Thursday, and it will put >>> all of this "Cursors can do it all, depending on how you define them" in >>> context.. >>> >>> -- >> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "Reagent-Project" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to [email protected]. >> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. >> Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/reagent-project. >> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. >> > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
