On Sunday, July 5, 2015 at 12:46:19 AM UTC+10, Mike Thompson wrote: > On Saturday, July 4, 2015 at 7:24:15 PM UTC+10, Daniel Compton wrote: > > Are you using Re-com as well? That relies heavily on Flexbox which is only > > just starting to be optimised in Firefox. I think Firefox 38 from memory > > was where it started to get better performance, although still not as fast > > as Chrome. The other tip is to look at the rendering timeline and see which > > parts of code/browser events are taking the most time. I'm most familiar > > with Chrome's one, but I assume that Firefox has a similar one. > > > Yeah, this is a good point. The flexbox implementation in Firefox v39 is > fast (just released). But the previous v38 is dog slow if flexbox is used. > > If you are using flexbox, then this could be a significant issue. Make sure > you are using Firefox 39.
Correction: version 38 fixed the slowness in flexbox (came out in May). It was the previous Firefox 37 which was dog slow. -- Mike -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
