Any reason why you would not want to build off of the Java version? On Sunday, 13 March 2016, <lawrenceopenroadme...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I'll rephrase the question that I asked in a different thread. If I start > work on a GraphQL server that is written in Clojure, what work could I > build off of? I see others have discussed the use of InstaParse and that > does seem like the obvious starting point. Did anyone get very far using > InstaParse to build a grammar for GraphQL? > > > > On Saturday, February 27, 2016 at 10:00:28 AM UTC-5, marc fawzi wrote: > > To close the loop on the Limitations part of my GraphQL/Relay conceptual > ealuation :) > > > > > > Limitations > > Query resolution in GraphQL is defined in the schema, which implements > data model transformations that maybe evaluated as part of the the query, > e.g. OrderBy, InRange, hasSomeRelation etc. > > This carries the interesting implication that GraphQL cannot be used (on > its own) to support the kind of cient-defined queries that require ad-hoc > model transformations. An example would be an app that allows the user to > slice and dice her data in an arbitrary fashion. > > Here are the responses I got to the above: > > > > If we stop thinking of GraphQL as a Graph Query Language in the Graph DB > sense, which it's not, and instead think of it as Graph-y RPC Language then > it makes sense to use a Query DSL. The confusion beginners often have is > with the idea implied by GraphQL, i.e. a graph query language. The chosen > name is GraphQL where Q stands for "Query" but in reality it's a "Graph-y > RPC Language" or "Graph-based Extensible API Protocol." > > >><< > > So my question is do we have something similar or better than > GraphQL/Relay in the Clojure/Script world? Om.Next/Datomic? or is that a > very different model? asking naively since I've not had a chance to play > with Om.Next/Datomic yet, but is there a reason to? Can it be better than > the GraphQL/Relay combination? If so, in what ways? > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 6:19 PM, Marc Fawzi <marc....@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > Didn't take me long before I zoomed in on the dark side of GraphQL :) > like a magnet > > > > > > See under "Limitations" > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/49a095b6bc528638f34f > > > > Sent from my iPhone > > > > > > > > On Feb 19, 2016, at 8:41 PM, Marc Fawzi <marc....@gmail.com > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > So, I'm having great fun playing with an in-house implementation of the > GraphQL spec (extended to do more, and some custom-y things) and I wanted > to share the rational for our adoption of GraphQL/Relay with the > Clojure/Script in hope that I can see how it differs from Om.Next + Datomic > (or whatever Om.Next uses on the backend) from enlightened folks > > > > > > For me this kind of 'deep architecture' is unattainable via things like > Reagent/Reframe and Om.Next is probably (I'm thinking out loud here) the > closest option for those of us who like to stay within the Clojure/Script > ecosystem. > > > > > > Please feel free to take this post apart > > > > > > https://gist.github.com/idibidiart/49a095b6bc528638f34f > > > > > > and let us know if we're missing anything. > > > > > > I focused on Redux + Reselect in my critique but the same applies to > Reframe, which is what Redux/Reselect aims to mimic in the JS world. > > > > > > Also, for another perspective on this topic of comparing advances in JS > to state of the art in ClojureScript, someone from the GraphQL team tweeted > this last week, and so I feel obliged to include it, although I've yet to > read it myself (life is short) > > > > > > > http://hueypetersen.com/posts/2016/02/13/om-next-from-a-relay-graphql-perspective/ > > > > > > > > Cheers > > > > > > Marc > > -- > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > --- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "ClojureScript" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com <javascript:;>. > To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com > <javascript:;>. > Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript. > -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
