On Monday, August 29, 2016 at 9:57:19 PM UTC+2, Michael Glaesemann wrote: > > On 2016-08-29, at 12:27, Georgi Danov <georgi.da...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Exactly. Datascript, hand rolled normalized, same demoralized > > Well, I hope you're not *too* demoralized :) > > I haven't worked with anything other than the default data store, but I think > what'd I'd do is determine what parts of the mutate and read methods are > specific to the storage, as they can also include application logic. Those > storage-specific parts I'd maybe create a protocol for, and implement the > protocol for the different storage backends. AIUI, you wouldn't need to worry > about where you call om/transact! at all: om/transact! works through the > parser, and you'll have the storage-specific implementations there. > > Does that make sense? I defer to anyone who's actually done this :) > > Michael Glaesemann > grzm seespotcode net
(facepalm) well, I am demoralized but that's another story... thanks -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
