Thanks for pointing me to your library and to the other thread, I'll take a look!
In general, I disagree that a string-based solution is strictly worse than a map-based solution, since using strings can help the library remain evergreen. If the library can inject strings that use "real" CSS with little or no parsing, it means that it'll be more likely to support new CSS syntax without needing any updates. It also means that current CSS syntax weirdnesses such as pseudoclasses (:hover, etc) and queries (@media, @supports) work how you'd expected them to. -- Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "ClojureScript" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojurescript+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to clojurescript@googlegroups.com. Visit this group at https://groups.google.com/group/clojurescript.
