Quick question, I seem to remember there was a review request for python-cloudservers that was semi-abandoned, did I miss when it got packaged? It certainly is not in fedora 15 last time I checked. On Aug 23, 2011 2:30 PM, "David Nalley" <[email protected]> wrote: > On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 5:25 PM, Peter Robinson <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Tue, Aug 23, 2011 at 10:09 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 12:52, David Nalley <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Bill Nottingham <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=731712 >>>>> >>>>> The HekaFS maintainers were looking for a appropriate group for their >>>>> package. I was thinking that perhaps having a 'cloud infrastructure' >>>>> or 'cloud support' group might be the best place, but we don't have >>>>> one of those, and I'm not sure what all packages should be in it. >>>>> >>>>> Would someone fom the Cloud SIG like to take a stab at it? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Bill >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> While I am happy to do this, haven't we already hit string freeze for >>>> F16 (August 2nd per the schedule)? So we are talking about >>>> comps-f17.xml.in? >>>> >>>> If I were to do so I think I'd put the following in the group: >>>> >>>> eucatools >>>> aeolus >>>> deltacloud >>>> sheepdog >>>> ceph >>>> glusterfs >>>> hekafs >>>> boxgrinder >>> >>> I am guessing that there will also be a need to have what is optional >>> and required... >> >> I would possibly suggest that they're all optional, there's lots of >> different cloud technologies there a lot of which are completely >> standalone separate products that aren't required to interoperate. By >> having them all optional there's a menu with the list there and people >> can select the particular type of cloud technologies they wish to use. >> > > I tend to agree, the spread is so wide, and includes everything from > HA stuff for the cloud to multiple distributed filesystems, to IaaS > platforms..... short of us defining cloud rather restrictively, I > think this needs to be all optional. > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > [email protected] > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list [email protected] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
