Agreed, it doesn't make sense to keep 32bit images for these.
On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 12:19 PM, Sam Kottler <s...@shk.io> wrote: > On 2014-04-30 21:55, Matthew Miller wrote: > >> I know we discussed keeping the 32-bit image around, but I don't think we >> actually covered the specialized images. >> >> Docker doesn't even support 32 bit hosts -- it may someday, but even then, >> the assumption of most containers is gonna be 64-bit x86_64. >> >> And I don't think it makes sense to have a 32-bit big data image, but >> maybe >> I'm wrong on that for certain workloads? >> > > +1 on only supporting a 64-bit image at least for big data and docker. I > can't think of any tools or applications thereof that would make sense to > run 32-bit but maybe mattf, willb, or others know of some? > > _______________________________________________ > cloud mailing list > cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
_______________________________________________ cloud mailing list cloud@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct