Yes, I switched back to the old cluster. This is a new tool that was used
in production even if only rarely. I can't leave it offline for hours.

I have created a test tool as a copy with which I can reproduce the issue:
tools.countcounttest@tools-sgebastion-07:~$ kubectl get pods
NAME                              READY   STATUS              RESTARTS   AGE
countcounttest-6b58f5c547-mf4jx   0/1     ContainerCreating   0          77s

I will leave that running. If the container gets created I might also be
able to reproduce the segfault.

Best regards,

Count Count

On Sun, Jan 12, 2020 at 10:20 PM Alex Monk <kren...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Count Count,
>
> I'm afraid you seem to have no pods on the new cluster to look at:
>
> # kubectl get -n tool-flaggedrevspromotioncheck pod
> No resources found.
>
> Alex
>
> On Sun, 12 Jan 2020 at 21:07, Count Count <countvoncount123...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Hi!
>>
>> I don't have much luck with a webservice based on the python3.7 image. It
>> is running fine on the legacy K8s cluster.
>>
>> On the new cluster I got a segfault. After stopping the webservice and
>> trying again to get an empty log the pod is now stuck in ContainerCreating.
>>
>> A few minutes ago:
>> tools.flaggedrevspromotioncheck@tools-sgebastion-08:~$ kubectl get pods
>> NAME                                         READY   STATUS
>>  RESTARTS   AGE
>> flaggedrevspromotioncheck-7cbfff44fc-jnhmq   0/1     ContainerCreating
>> 0          2m48s
>>
>> ...and just now:
>> tools.flaggedrevspromotioncheck@tools-sgebastion-08:~$ kubectl get pods
>> NAME                                         READY   STATUS
>>  RESTARTS   AGE
>> flaggedrevspromotioncheck-7cbfff44fc-q55gm   0/1     ContainerCreating
>> 0          5m18s
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Count Count
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 9, 2020 at 10:58 PM Bryan Davis <bd...@wikimedia.org> wrote:
>>
>>> I am happy to announce that a new and improved Kubernetes cluster is
>>> now available for use by beta testers on an opt-in basis. A page has
>>> been created on Wikitech [0] outlining the self-service migration
>>> process.
>>>
>>> Timeline:
>>> * 2020-01-09: 2020 Kubernetes cluster available for beta testers on an
>>> opt-in basis
>>> * 2020-01-23: 2020 Kubernetes cluster general availability for
>>> migration on an opt-in basis
>>> * 2020-02-10: Automatic migration of remaining workloads from 2016
>>> cluster to 2020 cluster by Toolforge admins
>>>
>>> This new cluster has been a work in progress for more than a year
>>> within the Wikimedia Cloud Services team, and a top priority project
>>> for the past six months. About 35 tools, including
>>> https://tools.wmflabs.org/admin/, are currently running on what we are
>>> calling the "2020 Kubernetes cluster". This new cluster is running
>>> Kubernetes v1.15.6 and Docker 19.03.4. It is also using a newer
>>> authentication and authorization method (RBAC), a new ingress routing
>>> service, and a different method of integrating with the Developer
>>> account LDAP service. We have built a new tool [1] which makes the
>>> state of the Kubernetes cluster more transparent and on par with the
>>> information that we already expose for the grid engine cluster [2].
>>>
>>> With a significant number of tools managed by Toolforge administrators
>>> already migrated to the new cluster, we are fairly confident that the
>>> basic features used by most Kubernetes tools are covered. It is likely
>>> that a few outlying issues remain to be found as more tools move, but
>>> we have confidence that we can address them quickly. This has led us
>>> to propose a fairly short period of voluntary beta testing, followed
>>> by a short general availability opt-in migration period, and finally a
>>> complete migration of all remaining tools which will be done by the
>>> Toolforge administration team for anyone who has not migrated their
>>> self.
>>>
>>> Please help with beta testing if you have some time and are willing to
>>> get help on irc, Phabricator, and the cloud@lists.wikimedia.org
>>> mailing list for early adopter issues you may encounter.
>>>
>>> I want to publicly praise Brooke Storm and Arturo Borrero González for
>>> the hours that they have put into reading docs, building proof of
>>> concept clusters, and improving automation and processes to make the
>>> 2020 Kubernetes cluster possible. The Toolforge community can look
>>> forward to more frequent and less disruptive software upgrades in this
>>> cluster as a direct result of this work. We have some other feature
>>> improvements in planning now that I think you will all be excited to
>>> see and use later this year!
>>>
>>> [0]:
>>> https://wikitech.wikimedia.org/wiki/News/2020_Kubernetes_cluster_migration
>>> [1]: https://tools.wmflabs.org/k8s-status/
>>> [2]: https://tools.wmflabs.org/sge-status/
>>>
>>> Bryan (on behalf of the Toolforge admins and the Cloud Services team)
>>> --
>>> Bryan Davis              Technical Engagement      Wikimedia Foundation
>>> Principal Software Engineer                               Boise, ID USA
>>> [[m:User:BDavis_(WMF)]]                                      irc: bd808
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wikimedia Cloud Services announce mailing list
>>> cloud-annou...@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly
>>> labs-annou...@lists.wikimedia.org)
>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud-announce
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wikimedia Cloud Services mailing list
>> Cloud@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly lab...@lists.wikimedia.org)
>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wikimedia Cloud Services mailing list
> Cloud@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly lab...@lists.wikimedia.org)
> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud
_______________________________________________
Wikimedia Cloud Services mailing list
Cloud@lists.wikimedia.org (formerly lab...@lists.wikimedia.org)
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/cloud

Reply via email to