We can put the binary into somewhere, but in the source code.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:chiradeep.vit...@citrix.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 2:13 PM
> To: CloudStack DeveloperList
> Subject: Re: IPtables deb in source repo
>
> However this means that if someone wants to build a system vm
> themselves
> (to add new packages for example), this fix will not be available.
>
> On 8/3/12 1:43 PM, "Edison Su" <edison...@citrix.com> wrote:
>
> >From the git log:
> >commit aeda3f3a1c64efa1deb34f7fcb280e4155c4fe7d
> >Author: Sheng Yang <sheng.y...@cloud.com>
> >Date: Wed Dec 28 17:35:09 2011 -0800
> >
> > bug 11056: Add customized iptables and kernel modules to the
> system
> >template
> >
> > The new kernel module xt_CHECKSUM.ko is based on [1], and back
> ported
> >to 2.6.32
> > kernel. New iptables is based on adding a new extension from [2].
> >
> > [1]https://lwn.net/Articles/396466/
> >
> >[2]https://git.netfilter.org/cgi-
> bin/gitweb.cgi?p=iptables.git;a=commit;h=
> >9d1b11102b53103c00b7fddf4658a4d2bdee1338
> >
> > status 11056: resolved fixed
> >
> >
> >
> >It fixes bug http://bugs.cloud.com/show_bug.cgi?id=11056, that
> >debina/ubuntu client can't get ip address in some cases.
> >It's ok to remove it from source tree, as the patched iptable binary
> >itself is already installed in system vm template.
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: David Nalley [mailto:da...@gnsa.us]
> >> Sent: Friday, August 03, 2012 1:09 PM
> >> To: cloudstack-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Subject: IPtables deb in source repo
> >>
> >> Hi folks:
> >>
> >> There's a deb for what I assume is a forked/modified copy of
> iptables
> >> in source:
> >>
> >> patches/systemvm/debian/iptables_1.4.8-3local1checksum1_i386.deb
> >>
> >> Why is it here?; what if any changes were made to this?; when this
> >> gets deleted (iptables is GPL), does it create any problems for
> >> generating systemVMs?
> >>
> >> --David
