> On Aug. 7, 2012, 4:49 a.m., Koushik Das wrote: > > The change look good. Since the schema is changing the update path also > > need to be handled.
Why is that? No previous CloudStack release has had cloudbridge integrated into it, so this wouldn't exist to be upgrade. - David ----------------------------------------------------------- This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6395/#review9942 ----------------------------------------------------------- On Aug. 6, 2012, 2:57 p.m., Sebastien Goasguen wrote: > > ----------------------------------------------------------- > This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: > https://reviews.apache.org/r/6395/ > ----------------------------------------------------------- > > (Updated Aug. 6, 2012, 2:57 p.m.) > > > Review request for cloudstack. > > > Description > ------- > > Increase column size of CloudstackOffering to 100 > > > This addresses bug CS-15623. > > > Diffs > ----- > > awsapi-setup/db/mysql/cloudbridge_offering.sql f21af5a > > Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6395/diff/ > > > Testing > ------- > > > Thanks, > > Sebastien Goasguen > >
