On 8/31/12 10:58 AM, "Anthony Xu" <[email protected]> wrote:
>I will use another way to fix this in VPC. >Are we sure guest NIC is always in eth0 in basic zone, advanced zone, >different hypervisor? Yes, in non VPC case guest network is always eth0. > > >Anthony > > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Chiradeep Vittal [mailto:[email protected]] >> Sent: Friday, August 31, 2012 9:38 AM >> To: CloudStack DeveloperList; Jayapal Reddy Uradi; Murali Reddy; >> Abhinandan Prateek; Sheng Yang >> Subject: Re: Review Request: Redundant VRs are not compatible with the >> old password get script >> >> This might fix the bug, but will probably break (if not already broken) >> password reset on the VPC VR. >> This is because the guest interfaces on the VPC vm are = number of >> guest >> networks, and the nic number may not be eth0 at all. >> >> On 8/31/12 5:57 AM, "Jayapal Reddy Uradi" >> <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> > >> >----------------------------------------------------------- >> >This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit: >> >https://reviews.apache.org/r/6872/ >> >----------------------------------------------------------- >> > >> >Review request for cloudstack, Abhinandan Prateek, Sheng Yang, and >> Murali >> >Reddy. >> > >> > >> >Description >> >------- >> > >> >While upgrading from 2.2.14 -> to 3.0.4 user VMs unable to reset the >> >password in case of redundant routers. >> >It is because the RRVM is listening on one ip of 8080 port, old user >> vm >> >send request on another IP. >> > >> >Made changes to socat to listen on eth0 interface. >> > >> > >> >This addresses bug 16243. >> > >> > >> >Diffs >> >----- >> > >> > patches/systemvm/debian/config/opt/cloud/bin/passwd_server 596715e >> > >> >Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/6872/diff/ >> > >> > >> >Testing >> >------- >> > >> >Tested on 3.0.x password reset. Also tested the bindtoedevice option >> of >> >the socat by sending request on two ip of the RRVM eth0. >> > >> > >> >Thanks, >> > >> >Jayapal Reddy >> > > >
