Oooops a writing mistake, see below On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Noah... > > On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:58 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >> My apologies, Mohammad. > > 1st of all no apologies are needed at Noah :), your concern was
1st of all no apologies are needed at all Noah :), your concern was > totally correct and actually it shows the sense of awareness about > open communities :) > >> >> Just getting up to speed on CloudStack. (My first time being a mentor.) I >> shall take care to read the older threads. :) > > It would be nice for sure, but I know it is sometimes hard to dig into > old e-mails more specifically for a very active community like ACS. > > But again don't feel reluctant at all sending any concerns, ideas, > comments, feedback, etc... . My point was that this kind of concerns > like the ones you already expressed were already discussed and hence > there is no reason to re-discuss them again :) > > Cya around in the mailing lists :) > >> >> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 5:56 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Hi Noah... >>> >>> Please read my feedback inline >>> >>> On Sat, Sep 8, 2012 at 6:48 PM, Noah Slater <[email protected]> wrote: >>> > How can people who do not use IRC participate in these meetings, or the >>> > discussions held at them? >>> > >>> > It is important that community discussions take place on the mailing >>> list. >>> > And where they take place off the mailing list, that they are summarised >>> on >>> > the mailing list. It is also important that people who do not use IRC are >>> > able to partake in discussions. >>> >>> Totally agree, and again, we have already discussed that. It is >>> already ASF rules and these rules have been conducted already on other >>> mailing threads. >>> >>> But IM sometimes give better chances to discuss things in details in >>> a way that might be better than having the same discussion over >>> e-mail. >>> >>> But no decisions will/should be made with bringing them back to the >>> mailing list and give all ppl involved the opportunity to give their >>> opinion and participate in the decision making. >>> >>> > >>> > One option is to hold meetings on IRC, post a summary of what was >>> > discussed, and then invite people on the mailing list to continue the >>> > discussion. But discussions must be copied to the mailing list, and >>> people >>> > must have a chance to participate. >>> > >>> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 10:55 PM, Mohammad Nour El-Din < >>> > [email protected]> wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi... >>> >> >>> >> Will not be able to have a times that suits all, try to get a time >>> >> that suits most of people for that time and they can attend next time, >>> >> taking into account having ASF rules when it comes to off the mailing >>> >> list communications. >>> >> >>> >> An idea I would like to propose is to have a certain list of topics >>> >> (agenda) for a specific IRC meeting so different people can evaluate >>> >> whether they should/shoudn't attend that meeting and hence you get >>> >> only the people interested and less people means agreeing on time >>> >> easier I believe. >>> >> >>> >> On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 11:34 PM, Joe Brockmeier <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >> > On Thu, Sep 6, 2012, at 04:21 PM, Wido den Hollander wrote: >>> >> >> The reason I'm opting for 21:00 UTC is that it's after dinner. >>> >> > >>> >> > That's totally reasonable... but 21:00 UTC is 17:00 for folks on >>> Eastern >>> >> > time in the U.S., which is usually the end of the work day for folks >>> who >>> >> > actually clock out at 5. (Actually, it's 17:00 part of the year, 16:00 >>> >> > part of the year since UTC is constant but you have daylight savings >>> to >>> >> > figure in for many timezones.) >>> >> > >>> >> >> I'd not rotate times, as that will confuse people. >>> >> > >>> >> > I agree with this - but if we go with a single time, it's going to be >>> >> > inconvenient for someone all of the time. So in that case, I guess >>> we're >>> >> > going to be stuck with deciding who gets stuck with an inconvenient >>> time >>> >> > all the time. >>> >> > -- >>> >> > Joe Brockmeier >>> >> > [email protected] >>> >> > Twitter: @jzb >>> >> > http://www.dissociatedpress.net/ >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> -- >>> >> Thanks >>> >> - Mohammad Nour >>> >> ---- >>> >> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep >>> moving" >>> >> - Albert Einstein >>> >> >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > NS >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Thanks >>> - Mohammad Nour >>> ---- >>> "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" >>> - Albert Einstein >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> NS > > > > -- > Thanks > - Mohammad Nour > ---- > "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" > - Albert Einstein -- Thanks - Mohammad Nour ---- "Life is like riding a bicycle. To keep your balance you must keep moving" - Albert Einstein
